Featuring: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Foundation Professor, MSU College of Law
Director of the Indigenous Law & Policy Center
This talk on policing and Anishinaabe political theory draws on work inspired by the statements of support for the Black Lives Matter movement from state supreme courts like those in Washington and elsewhere. In part, the article is addressed to the state judges who have spoken out on BLM and the judges on the Michigan forum who speak out in favor of Indian children. The novel claim of the article is that the Supreme Court long has used what Fletcher terms “social contract talk” to demean, dehumanize, and marginalize POC and lower-income persons most likely to be subjected to police interventions. This “social contract talk” is not the law but enables judges to grant police (and prosecutors, though not addressed directly) immense discretion to target POC and lower-income persons and to immunize them from legal consequences. Weaponized “social contract talk” recalls the origin of the social contract in America, which enabled and encouraged slavery and dispossession of Indigenous peoples. Fletcher offers an alternative to social contract talk rooted in Anishinaabe political philosophy, which encourages inclusion, healing, and accountability. Many tribes have relatively little policing of their territories and a completely different mentality about criminal justice.
Zoom Meeting ID: 921 3282 5090
Pwd : GGG2020